To blame the poor for subsisting on welfare has no justice unless we are also willing to judge every rich member of society by how productive he or she is. Taken individual by individual, it is likely that there's more idleness and abuse of government favors among the economically privileged than among the ranks of the disadvantaged.
-Norman Mailer, author (31 Jan 1923-2007)
The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much, it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.
-Franklin D. Roosevelt, 32nd US President (30 Jan 1882-1945)
Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer cell.
-Edward Abbey, naturalist and author (29 Jan 1927-1989)
Nothing doth more hurt in a state than that cunning men pass for wise.
-Francis Bacon, essayist, philosopher, and statesman (22 Jan 1561-1626)
In those parts of the world where learning and science have prevailed, miracles have ceased; but in those parts of it as are barbarous and ignorant, miracles are still in vogue.
-Ethan Allen, revolutionary (21 Jan 1738-1789)
Those who dream by day are cognizant of many things which escape those who dream only by night.
-Edgar Allan Poe, poet and short-story writer (19 Jan 1809-1849)
A certain kind of rich man afflicted with the symptoms of moral dandyism sooner or later comes to the conclusion that it isn't enough merely to make money. He feels obliged to hold views, to espouse causes and elect Presidents, to explain to a trembling world how and why the world went wrong.
-Lewis H. Lapham, editor and writer (8 Jan 1935-2024)
If you or your parents are immigrants, know that you are part of a proud American tradition -- the infusion of new cultures, talents and ideas, generation after generation, that has made us the greatest country on earth.
-Michelle Obama, lawyer, former first lady of the US (b. 17 Jan 1964)
Be kind to thy father, for when thou wert young, / Who loved thee so fondly as he? / He caught the first accents that fell from thy tongue, / And joined in thy innocent glee.
-Margaret Courtney, poet (1822-1862)
It is not what we do, but also what we do not do, for which we are accountable.
-Moliere, actor and playwright (15 Jan 1622-1673)
When one has been threatened with a great injustice, one accepts a smaller as a favour.
-Jane Welsh Carlyle, letter writer (14 Jan 1801-1866)
The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.
-Hermann Göring, Nαzi military leader (12 Jan 1893-1946)
New details emerge on redevelopment of Phoenix’s Punchcard Building
PHOENIX — New York-based development firm Left Lane is working through plans to turn the former Phoenix Financial Center into an urban, mixed-use resort to be called Recess Phoenix.
Left Lane has envisioned converting the 18-story office tower, known as the Punchcard Building, into 209 hotel rooms and 143 multifamily units, according to the company's website, which prominently displays the Phoenix project among its current developments.
The former financial center, recognized for its distinctive slots resembling vintage computer punch cards, is located in midtown at Central Avenue and Osborn Road.
Two 9,000-square-foot rotundas on the site could also be converted into uses such as restaurants, while the developer wants to add new buildings and amenities throughout the overall seven-acre property.
What the science of predators tells us about the morbidly rich
Opinion by
Nature and economics share some fascinating patterns, one of which explains why Donald Trump is about to become president and how the morbidly rich have appropriated over $50 trillion from working class people since the 1980s. Scientists use something called the Lorka-Volterra equations to explain how predators and prey interact in the wild.
These equations show us that animal populations rise and fall in predictable cycles — when there are lots of rabbits, fox populations grow, but as foxes eat more rabbits, the rabbit population shrinks, which then causes fox numbers to drop, allowing rabbits to multiply again.
Incredibly, this back-and-forth pattern mirrors what happens between the wealthy and working classes in our economy and political systems over the past 100 years.
Think about a forest ecosystem. When rabbits have plenty of grass to eat and safe places to hide, their numbers grow. As rabbit populations increase, foxes find it easier to catch prey, so they have more cubs and their numbers grow, too.
But eventually, the foxes become so numerous that they start catching too many rabbits. The rabbit population crashes, and soon after, fox numbers follow suit because there isn’t enough food to go around. This creates a natural cycle that repeats over and over, unless something comes along to change the rules of the game — like a new predator, a disease, or human intervention.
This same pattern plays out in our economy and political system, though we often don’t recognize it.
The working class, like the rabbits, create value through their labor and create demand — which drives economies — through their purchases of goods and services. They make products, provide services, consume both, and thus keep the economy running.
The wealthy class, like the foxes, extracts value through ownership, investment, and control of resources. When the system is balanced, both groups can thrive. But when it gets out of balance, trouble follows.
To see this pattern in action, look at a remarkable period in American history called the “Great Compression.” From 1900 to 1980 (with the brief exception of the Roaring Twenties), particularly after the New Deal, something unusual happened: the gap between rich and poor actually shrank for roughly 80 years. Working people saw their wages go up and their living standards improve.
This happened because new rules and institutions — including labor unions, Wall Street regulations, anti-monopoly laws, and higher progressive income taxes — kept economic “predators” (morbidly rich individuals and corporations) from taking too much from economic “prey” (working class and poor people).
Just like a healthy forest needs the rules of nature as expressed in the Lorka-Volterra equations to keep any one species from taking over, these progressive policies put into place by FDR created balance in the economy, and thus political harmony across the nation.
The specifics of those rules were comprehensive and carefully designed. The highest income tax rate on the wealthiest Americans was 90% in that era. Labor unions were protected by law and represented about one-third of all workers, meaning two-thirds of workers had the wage and benefits equivalent of a union job (union employers set local wage and benefit floors). Banks were strictly regulated and couldn’t engage in risky speculation with ordinary people’s savings.
Monopolies were broken up when they became too powerful; the Supreme Court blocked the merger of two shoe companies in the 1960s because the new combined company would control 5% of the shoe industry (today Nike has 19%).
Those rules didn’t prevent people from getting rich, but they did ensure that extreme wealth accumulation was harder and that workers received a fair share of the value they created.
The results were impressive. Between 1945 and 1980, when workers produced more, they earned more. A single breadwinner could support a family, own a home, buy a new car every few years, take a vacation, send kids to college, and retire with dignity and a pension.
Social mobility was high, meaning children regularly achieved higher living standards than their parents. The wealth created by the economy was shared more fairly than ever before.
The rich still got richer, but at a slower, more sustainable pace that allowed everyone else to prosper too.
But this balance didn’t last. In 1971, future (1972) Supreme Court Justice Lewis Powell wrote a memo that changed everything. He urged American businesses to fight against unions, environmental protections, and other rules that limited their power, crush the labor movement, and put corporations and rich people in charge of the commons.
This memo wasn’t just idle speculation; it became a blueprint for action. Business leaders and fossil-fuel billionaires created new think tanks, funded academic programs promoting so-called free-market ideology, and invested heavily in lobbying and political campaigns.
When Ronald Reagan became president in 1981, he started dismantling the rules that had kept the morbidly rich economic predators and their companies in check. He turned loose the foxes on the rabbits.
This era, which we might call the “Great Predation,” saw a dramatic reversal of the trends that defined the Great Compression. From 1980 to 2024, the wealthiest Americans extracted over $50 trillion from the working class, according to studies such as the Rand Corporation’s 2020 report on income redistribution.
Productivity continued to rise, but wages stagnated, and wealth increasingly concentrated at the top. The predators were thriving, but the prey — working-class Americans — were being systematically drained.
Reagan dramatically cut taxes on the morbidly rich. He, Bush, and Trump stripped away business regulations and Republicans on the Supreme Court stopped enforcing antitrust law. Unions lost their power when companies — with the support of Republicans on the Court — were allowed to fight them more aggressively.
Even Social Security and Medicare faced pressure, though they largely survived (although Republicans have already half-privatized Medicare with the Medicare Advantage scam, and are now talking about doing the same with Social Security).
While workers kept producing more, their wages barely grew. Instead, nearly all the new wealth went to those at the top. The predators were thriving, but their prey — ordinary working Americans — were being squeezed dry.
The changes were dramatic and far-reaching. CEO pay skyrocketed from about 30 times the average worker’s salary in 1980 to over 300 times by 2020. In some industries it’s thousands of times more, and in the companies of some billionaires like Musk, Zuckerberg, and Bezos, their income is hundreds of thousands or millions of times greater than their workers.
As a result of five corrupt Republicans on the Supreme Court giving the morbidly rich the absolute power to own politicians and put unlimited money into elections, the predation of the morbidly rich has gone into hyperdrive. The most obvious example of this recently was Elon Musk purchasing the White House for Trump with a bit more than a quarter-billion dollars, an amount that was basically pocket change for him.
More than half of Americans now live paycheck to paycheck, despite the country being richer than ever. Young people struggle to afford homes, start families, or save for retirement. Medical debt has become a leading cause of bankruptcy. Meanwhile, both the number of billionaires and their aggregate wealth have exploded, with some individuals accumulating more wealth than entire countries.
This pattern follows the same logic as those predator-prey equations. During the Great Compression, government rules acted like environmental protections, helping the middle class grow strong and creating a healthy consumer economy.
The wealthy still benefited, but couldn’t take too much. During the Great Predation, those protections disappeared. Without limits on economic predators, working people’s share of the pie began to shrink, just like rabbit populations fall when foxes have free rein.
But here’s the catch: just as foxes eventually run into trouble if they eat too many rabbits, extreme concentration of wealth creates problems for the wealthy too. When middle-class consumers struggle, the whole economy becomes unstable.
We see this today in several ways: young people can’t afford to buy homes or cars, leading to weak demand in key industries. Consumer debt has reached record levels as people try to maintain their standard of living. Social and political unrest grows as people lose faith in the system. We might be approaching a breaking point, and the 2024 election is a major warning.
The signs of strain are everywhere. Major retailers struggle as their customer base loses purchasing power. Tech companies lay off thousands despite record profits, trying to squeeze more value from fewer workers.
Young people increasingly reject capitalism altogether, correctly seeing Reagan’s version of it as a rigged game. Political polarization has reached dangerous levels as people search for someone to blame, resulting in the rise of demagogues like Trump, Vance, and Musk. And the steady stream of oligarchs rushing to Mar-a-Lago to kiss Trump’s a--.
The good news is that we can learn from nature about how to restore balance. In healthy ecosystems, predators and prey find a sustainable balance through natural mechanisms and occasional external interventions. In our economy, we know we can create this balance through smart policies because we already did it once for almost 80 years.
We need modern versions of the rules that worked during the Great Compression: Fair taxes, strong worker protections, and limits on corporate power. We also need new ideas, like universal basic income or profit-sharing, that can help distribute wealth more evenly.
Some specific solutions are already being tested around the world.
Worker representation on corporate boards, common in Germany, helps ensure companies consider employee interests. Public investment banks, like those in South Korea and Japan, can direct capital toward social needs rather than just private profits. Alaska’s Permanent Fund shows how natural resource wealth can be shared with all citizens. These examples prove that alternatives to pure billionaire predation are possible.
Just as predators play an important role in nature by keeping prey populations healthy and genetically fit, wealthy individuals and corporations can contribute positively to society through investment, innovation, and job creation.
The key is ensuring they do this in a way that strengthens the whole system rather than depleting it. This necessitates high taxes on extreme wealth, requirements to reinvest profits in workers and communities, and new forms of corporate ownership that share gains more broadly.
Looking ahead, our challenge is to move from predation to partnership like America did in the 1930s and Europe did in the 1950s. We must recognize that everyone’s prosperity — including that of the wealthy — depends on having a healthy middle class.
Creating this balance isn’t just morally right; it’s necessary for the economy and our political system to function well. By learning from both nature and history, we can build an economic and political system that works better for everyone, breaking free from the harsh cycles of boom and bust that have defined the past few decades.
The path forward requires both political will and innovative thinking. We must update our understanding of how modern economies work and be willing to experiment with new forms of regulation and wealth sharing.
The alternative — continuing down the path of unchecked billionaire predation — risks destroying the very system that creates wealth in the first place. Just as ecology teaches us that diverse, balanced ecosystems are the most resilient, economics shows us that broadly shared prosperity creates the strongest foundation for sustainable growth and political stability.
We all live under the same sky, but we don’t all have the same horizon.
-Konrad Adenauer, statesman (5 Jan 1876-1967)
I believe in evidence. I believe in observation, measurement, and reasoning, confirmed by independent observers. I'll believe anything, no matter how wild and ridiculous, if there is evidence for it. The wilder and more ridiculous something is, however, the firmer and more solid the evidence will have to be.
-Isaac Asimov, scientist and writer (2 Jan 1920-1992)
